16 cities covered · Currency: XAF (FCFA) · Capital: Malabo
| Expense | Estimated cost | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Meal at an inexpensive restaurant | FCFA2,886 ($4.77) | per meal |
| Three-course meal for two, mid-range | FCFA11,543 ($19.08) | per meal |
| Cappuccino | FCFA866 ($1.43) | each |
| Monthly groceries (single person) | FCFA65,413 ($108) | per month |
| Monthly public transport pass | FCFA10,581 ($17.49) | per month |
| Basic utilities for an 85m² apartment | FCFA27,897 ($46.11) | per month |
| Internet (60 Mbps, unlimited) | FCFA8,080 ($13.36) | per month |
| Fitness club membership | FCFA8,080 ($13.36) | per month |
| Cinema ticket | FCFA2,116 ($3.50) | each |
| One-bedroom apartment in city centre | FCFA119,731 ($198) | per month |
| One-bedroom apartment outside centre | FCFA83,291 ($138) | per month |
| Three-bedroom apartment in city centre | FCFA249,873 ($413) | per month |
Bioko Norte · pop. 297,000
Litoral · pop. 290,000
Centro Sur · pop. 41,084
Kié-Ntem · pop. 36,565
Bioko Norte · pop. 29,366
Wele-Nzas · pop. 16,626
Wele-Nzas · pop. 15,644
Litoral · pop. 14,034
Wele-Nzas · pop. 13,382
Bioko Norte · pop. 10,000
Centro Sur · pop. 9,155
Bioko Sur · pop. 7,739
Wele-Nzas · pop. 7,251
Annobón · pop. 5,008
Djibloho · pop. 2,000
Litoral · pop. 628
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Equatorial Guinea
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Equatorial Guinea
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Equatorial Guinea
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Equatorial Guinea
Living costs in Equatorial Guinea vary significantly depending on city size. Large metropolitan areas with populations over one million typically see housing costs 15–30% above the national average, while smaller towns can be 10–20% below it. The national baseline of FCFA275,681 ($456) per month represents a mid-sized city estimate.
Capital cities and major economic hubs command the highest rents and overall expenses. For budget-conscious residents, mid-sized cities offer a balance of amenities and affordability. Rural and small-town living remains the most economical option, though transport and service access may be limited.