191 cities covered · Currency: UZS (soʻm) · Capital: Tashkent
| Expense | Estimated cost | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Meal at an inexpensive restaurant | soʻm48,463 ($3.82) | per meal |
| Three-course meal for two, mid-range | soʻm193,853 ($15.26) | per meal |
| Cappuccino | soʻm14,539 ($1.14) | each |
| Monthly groceries (single person) | soʻm1,098,499 ($86.50) | per month |
| Monthly public transport pass | soʻm177,698 ($13.99) | per month |
| Basic utilities for an 85m² apartment | soʻm468,478 ($36.89) | per month |
| Internet (60 Mbps, unlimited) | soʻm135,697 ($10.68) | per month |
| Fitness club membership | soʻm135,697 ($10.68) | per month |
| Cinema ticket | soʻm35,540 ($2.80) | each |
| One-bedroom apartment in city centre | soʻm2,042,101 ($161) | per month |
| One-bedroom apartment outside centre | soʻm1,420,592 ($112) | per month |
| Three-bedroom apartment in city centre | soʻm4,261,776 ($336) | per month |
Toshkent · pop. 2,956,384
Namangan · pop. 626,120
Andijon · pop. 547,800
Samarqand · pop. 546,303
Qoraqalpog‘iston · pop. 319,583
Farg‘ona · pop. 288,850
Buxoro · pop. 280,187
Qashqadaryo · pop. 274,891
Farg‘ona · pop. 252,731
Farg‘ona · pop. 215,400
Jizzax · pop. 163,200
Toshkent · pop. 159,400
Xorazm · pop. 150,000
Qashqadaryo · pop. 142,700
Toshkent · pop. 141,894
Surxondaryo · pop. 136,200
Navoiy · pop. 134,100
Toshkent · pop. 126,962
Buxoro · pop. 107,566
Xorazm · pop. 105,300
Samarqand · pop. 99,675
Surxondaryo · pop. 97,196
Navoiy · pop. 86,745
Samarqand · pop. 84,741
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Uzbekistan
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Uzbekistan
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Uzbekistan
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Uzbekistan
Living costs in Uzbekistan vary significantly depending on city size. Large metropolitan areas with populations over one million typically see housing costs 15–30% above the national average, while smaller towns can be 10–20% below it. The national baseline of soʻm4,651,472 ($366) per month represents a mid-sized city estimate.
Capital cities and major economic hubs command the highest rents and overall expenses. For budget-conscious residents, mid-sized cities offer a balance of amenities and affordability. Rural and small-town living remains the most economical option, though transport and service access may be limited.