40 cities covered · Currency: TMT (m) · Capital: Ashgabat
| Expense | Estimated cost | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Meal at an inexpensive restaurant | m16.70 ($4.77) | per meal |
| Three-course meal for two, mid-range | m66.78 ($19.08) | per meal |
| Cappuccino | m5.01 ($1.43) | each |
| Monthly groceries (single person) | m378 ($108) | per month |
| Monthly public transport pass | m61.22 ($17.49) | per month |
| Basic utilities for an 85m² apartment | m161 ($46.11) | per month |
| Internet (60 Mbps, unlimited) | m46.75 ($13.36) | per month |
| Fitness club membership | m46.75 ($13.36) | per month |
| Cinema ticket | m12.24 ($3.50) | each |
| One-bedroom apartment in city centre | m649 ($186) | per month |
| One-bedroom apartment outside centre | m452 ($129) | per month |
| Three-bedroom apartment in city centre | m1,355 ($387) | per month |
Aşgabat · pop. 1,030,063
Lebap · pop. 230,861
Daşoguz · pop. 227,184
Balkan · pop. 139,000
Mary · pop. 126,141
Mary · pop. 110,545
Balkan · pop. 89,582
Balkan · pop. 86,800
Ahal · pop. 77,024
Lebap · pop. 38,350
Mary · pop. 37,705
Daşoguz · pop. 36,754
Ahal · pop. 33,759
Ahal · pop. 29,606
Balkan · pop. 26,831
Ahal · pop. 24,702
Lebap · pop. 24,251
Balkan · pop. 23,697
Ahal · pop. 21,154
Lebap · pop. 20,491
Daşoguz · pop. 19,296
Daşoguz · pop. 15,580
Balkan · pop. 15,386
Mary · pop. 14,940
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Turkmenistan
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Turkmenistan
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Turkmenistan
Side-by-side cost of living comparison in Turkmenistan
Living costs in Turkmenistan vary significantly depending on city size. Large metropolitan areas with populations over one million typically see housing costs 15–30% above the national average, while smaller towns can be 10–20% below it. The national baseline of m1,565 ($447) per month represents a mid-sized city estimate.
Capital cities and major economic hubs command the highest rents and overall expenses. For budget-conscious residents, mid-sized cities offer a balance of amenities and affordability. Rural and small-town living remains the most economical option, though transport and service access may be limited.